Friday, September 30, 2022
The Churn
Wednesday, September 28, 2022
To Russia With Love
Monday, May 3, 2021
The Flow of (TD)ao
21/05/01
V& I know a great story about a Taoist sage. I'm missing the source so here is my retelling - respect is meant for the characters and culture.
{Image courtesy oor https://www.firmani.com/uncategorized/crisis-in-chinese/}
For the past seven years the river had flooded the fields to the point of washing out the dikes between the pattys and washing away some of the tender, young rice shoots. The rice yield fell by a third. Once a prosperous community, the village was now on hard times. Something had to be done.
The headman called a group together & strengthened the dikes. It didn't work. The emperor's tax collectors called in the emperor's engineers. The next year the flooding was even worse. The emperor's advisors proposed solutions but none could be found that calmed the river. Finally, in desparation, one of the younger advisors said he knew of a Taoist magician who might be able to help. He was summoned immediately and brought to the village.
Wednesday, February 12, 2020
The Influence of Science Fiction on Consciosness
It is an iconic image.The serene and stately Michael Renee raises his hand in greeting to the circle of soldiers surrounding his flying saucer. It is particularly poignant moment for me because it's one of the few times I remember really connecting emotionaly with my father. We both sat in wonder at the possibilities of the universe. On the remote chance that you have never seen "The Day the Earth Stood Still", you owe yourself a favor..Please do. It's delightfully dated but the message is still relevant. Renee's character stoically presents an ultimatum and an opportunity to
mankind - get your act together or face horrific consequences. For me it's more. Today, contact experiences report receiving an almost identical message from many NHI sources. It's a movie that has entered into the collective consciousness.
Science fiction entered my consciousness several years after my first contact experiences and well before "Day". At age nine the older cousin I looked up to got me to read Robert Heinlein 's The Starbeast about a boy making friends with a large reptillian. This was in 1956. I was hooked on first contact. All the way to the late 60s I was a nerd for s.f. It painted exciting possibilites for seeing the universe thru an entirely different set of perceptual filters. Other movies slowly followed from Hollywood, most notibly "Forbidden Planet" where a scientist grapples with monsters of his own subconscious made manifest by ancient alien technology, but this was a rare gem. Most Hollywood productions promoted fear of the unknown somewhat like the grays have been said to do as a a control mechanism.
Meanwhile television, being a newer media, was more exploritory. Serlings "Twilight Zone", then "Outer Limits" led to "Star Trek". "There is nothing wrong with your television set" began Outer Limits, which then proceded to convince me that if I went outside I would see them landing. "Star Trek", despite a poor initial audience, went on to spawn one of the biggest francises ever with a new spin off currently airing on CBS. For the first time in mass media contact was shown as a phenomena as likely to be mutually beneficial as hostile.
Written science fiction was way ahead. Not only did it presage contacts of multiple types, it also delved deeply into questions about the process of consciousness. Alfred Bester's The Stars My Destination went further into the exploration of consciousness when he tryed to describe in prose the phenomenon of synesthesia wherein sensory input is scrambled so that vision becomes smell and touch becomes taste etc. As far as I know the idea of "telepathy" was primarily restricted to science fiction as in A.E.van Vogt's Slan. Mass media was still far behind but the cadre of nerds like myself who read s.f. had been inculcated with the virus.
Then came 2001. Overnight college populations began to read s.f. It became a respectable subject in college literature courses. It entered the minds of the intelligencia. On the screen most s.f. was monsters and dystopia, but the idea of communicating with other beings in a meaningful wayhad arrived.
At the end of 2001 is a light show that left the audience stunned and ecstatic or confused. Ask yourself, just in speculation, isn't it possible that the lighshow at the end was a visual "download. "- A form of telepathy?
Hollywood as a whole still had not caught up. S.F. was still not popular with a large audience. That is until "Star Wars.- A New Hope" in 1977. There rapidly followed a series of movies promoting the possiblilities of beneficial contact: "E.T. - the Extraterrestrial", "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" (which envisioned using music as a common language) "Cocoon" (which had glowing golden NHIs similar to many contactee reports) and others less noteworthy.
As was reported of popular science fiction author, Philip K. Dick, the weave between the open minds of creative minds of extra-terrestrial contactees and science fiction continue. In my mind they are becoming indistiguishable. I am convinced I am in telepathic contact with extraterrestrial entities. As with Russian philosopher of science, P.D. Oespensky in his description of "mental conversations with G[urdjieff - ed.] I am simultaneously elated and abashed that the information is recieved in such a subjective manner. I can't prove a word of it, much less meet Carl Sagan's criteria that it should require extraordinary proof. Yet, the synchronicity of serendiptous correlations grows in my conscioussness and, siren-like, beckons my curiousity forward with a caution "Beware of Mind Fields." Am I to be proven a ludicrous loon should I continue my exploration?
The recent (five star in my book) s.f. movie "Arrival" strikes me as a far more likely first contact scenario than those traditionaly posited by traditional contact. The suggestion that the aliens in the movie percieve time in a non-linear way fits well with information I have. Further, the idea that the visitors are all humanoid is a sticking point for me. Nature is wonderfully imaginative and prolific. If I can imagine a eight foot high semi-liquid intelligent block of jello that knows how to manipulate electro-static fields thru the movement of its organelles inside the cell membrane, why would I expect mother nature to send only humanoids to visit us? I think these objections can be ultimately explained but I'm disturbed by generally the human-centric view of NHI experiences. Has the cosmic mind begun injecting a more generalized view of intelligent beings into Jung's collective subconscious?
The night I began writing this post, Julian May's "Intervention" was playing on an Alexis audiobook:
I think a mass revelation/disclosure is upon us It should be interesting. Hell, I think it will be great fun. It will almost certainly be different than expected. But, I've been known to be wrong.
Monday, November 11, 2019
Service for Citizenship
The 11th of November is set aside in the U.S. for honoring those who are veterans of U.S. military service. My military service proved an invaluable experience for me. It's been over fifty years since I slogged thru Southeast Asian mud so thick that we had to call in a huey (UH-1D helicopter) to pull the machine gunner out of where he had become stuck. Yet that experience still informs my thoughts on how to structure a compassionate and just society. We made mistakes. Undoubtedly we'll make them again. Still, I am proud that I did my best to represent the highest ideals of our democracy to the world by presenting a compassionate face to those I met as do U.S. servicemen all over the world today.
The pre-amble of Constitution of the United States of America defines its intent to include "promote the general welfare". Thus, our the founding fathers saw one intent of our government was to aid its citizens. This half of the relationship between citizen and government seems clear. It proposes that government has an obligation to its citizens. In the years I have been formulating my political philosophy, it has become clear to me that, for a citizen to contribute to the society as a whole, each of those citizens must have the necessary conditions to do so. It seems self evident these necessary conditions include food, shelter, and mental and physical health. For this reason I have long supported the idea of a guaranteed national income (what has become known as universal basic income - this could be supported by a Universal Transaction Tax in lieu of all other forms of tax.)
Yet the other half of the relationship between society and citizen, the responsibility of that citizen to the state (as administrated by the government) is not directly mentioned in our constitution. This is a serious, perhaps even fatal, lapse of rigor. There is, however, a proposed principle which could equitably rectify this lapse.
In his science fiction book, Starship Troopers, author and U.S. Navy vet Robert A. Heinlein postulated a society in which democratic participation is contingent upon (military) service. If you don't serve, you don't get to vote. Hear, hear!
I don't expect to see even referendums disenfranchising voters any time soon. At the very least, measures requiring voters be veterans would have to be gradual. Yet veterans are the only group to have demonstrated their worthiness to vote by the reciprocal action in their relationship to the state of providing their service. We are the only ones who have proven our right by our service.
I don't propose that this service require willingness to bare arms. During the Viet Nam era in which I served, I greatly admired those of conscience who refused combat on grounds of personal conviction. I will always admire with gratitude the service of one of the medics in my unit who refused to carry weapons. Military service need not require a willingness to fight. Yet, for several reasons, I think that the obligation of an individual's service to society at large is best attained thru military service. Military service provides a common background of discipline,duty, and honor to all vets.
My service eventually provided me with the tools to participate more fully in our democracy. It gave me the confidence to assert my own path in life. It have me a broader view of the world by taking me places that introduced cultures different from my own. It gave me a broader view of the composition of my own society by introducing me to individuals, both admirable and not, of very different socio-economic backgrounds than my own. Eventually, my service helped secure an advanced education, a home, and ongoing medical care. These days, it also provides sufficient to give me have a low income, low impact, but desirable lifestyle.
It's currently considered good form to thank vets for their service. It always embarrasses me slightly as completely unnecessary. I am grateful for the experiences of my military service and for the benefits it accrued. I am convinced I am better, more informed citizen from my military experience. We vets earned the right to participate in our democracy. I think every one else should earn theirs too for their own benefit as well as societies. I support Universal Service. On this day of remembrance and re-dedication I commend this thought to all the men and women who honor their oath to the Constitution by their service past, present and future.
Friday, October 26, 2018
Patriotism
Nonetheless, it prompted me to scribe some thoughts I've had recently on the subjects of patriotism and heroism. I think Kipling gave the best definition of what society calls a hero in his poem if:
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs... (full poem @: "If," A Poem by Rudyard Kipling)
I don't think that doing your job in a stressful, possibly life-threatening situation is particularly heroic. In the case where I received an army award for valor I simply kept my cool while others were losing theirs. No bravery was involved, just simple self preservation. Those things which for which I was proud of my courage were small and went unnoticed at large. To me a hero is someone who puts himself on the line when he or she doesn't have to without expectation of reward or recognition.
But what I really wanted to address was the subject of "patriotism". In my experience 90% of what is called "patriotism" in the United States is not. It is jingoism. It is: let's jump on the band wagon and pound our chests while loudly proclaiming our tribe is better than anyone else's: "Our country (state,county, city, township), love it or leave it". While regional pride is a fine thing, this nonsense (I and my tribe are better than you and your tribe) is dangerous. To me, a true patriot opposes this type of thinking.
The true patriot is one who acts in a heroic manner for the good of their tribe. Especially those who sacrifice to that end. Most especially those who go oppose the mob opinion. I served in Viet Nam without regret. I laud those who throughout our history have given of themselves, perhaps risking their lives for their country. I respect those who left the U.S. to evade the Viet Nam war but those who stayed behind and fought it were, in my book the at least as TRUE patriots.
For a democracy to function it is absolutely necessary that unpopular opinions be heard lest the democratic process be overwhelmed by the "tyranny of the majority". To publicly express an unpopular opinion requires courage. To be a heroic patriot means standing up to the crowd and saying "you're wrong" and "here's why."
Thursday, July 13, 2017
Four Steps to a Rational Society
Four Steps to a Rational Society
What does the obligation of the individual to society? What is the obligation of society to the individual? In order to determine what a rational structure for a society might be, one must first ask what the function of that society is. In a democracy it seems clear that that function is to provide for the welfare of its members. When a society fails to provide the necessities of life for a member, that member is no longer capable of participating in the society. Thus food, shelter, clothing and health, both physical and mental are obligations of society. Further when the society fulfills that obligation it seems only reasonable that the individual owes service of some form to that society.
These conclusions lead to the first two of the four steps to a rational society:
1) UBI - Universal Basic Income (Guaranteed Income)
The simplest way for a society to meet it's obligation of providing for the welfare of its members on an individual basis is what I originally called a guaranteed national income and has now come to be called "Universal Basic Income". This is a rational approach to equality under the law.
2) USvc - Universal Service (a universal draft)
Any citizen not willing to provide service to the society in which they live is not worthy of that society. The mechanisms for providing that service under law must be, of necessity, of some complexity. However as a first pass it seems to this author that, as the working life of an adult is approximately 50 years, a draft for all citizens of 5 years service (10%h of adult working life) is not unreasonable.
How then may the funds necessary to support step 1) and other public works be raised in an equitable? This leads to the second two steps:
3) Transaction Tax - a tax on all public exchanges of goods and services to the exclusion of all other taxes
Providing the extensive funds necessary to finance UBI may best be achieved by a transaction tax in the absence of all other forms of taxation. The society provides the means for the transition to take place so ethical grounds for its taxation are established. The current system of taxation is so grossly unfair that it is laughable. The middle class experiences higher, & higher tax rates, while trillion dollar corporations use tax shelters to avoid paying. In the U.S. approximately 5 billion dollars in transactions occur every day. A 10% tax on these transitions would provide enough in a single day to yield over a thousand dollars for every U.S. citizen. Further, this would, in all likely-hood, result in a bureaucracy greatly reduced from the current kludge. An old rule in design is "KISS: keep it simple, stupid." Simple is fairer.
4) Tax Use Choice - implementation of the citizen's right to determine how his taxes are used.
In today's society, an option that has never before been available is available: the choice of which public works (aside from the given UBI) to which the citizen's tax dollars are spent. The use of computers makes this possible. Every citizen should be able to say where their tax dollars are put to work. As an example, I am a proponent of space exploration. Many I know are not. I should be able to put my tax dollars into this public work while my neighbor, who supports better street lightening (which I think superfluous) puts their money into the lighting.
Obviously, there are details to be worked out here should such a utopian scheme ever be adopted. Let me warn here that adoption of a 1)UBI without some form of 2)universal service can not work and I would oppose it. Today's political realities may prevent such a scheme from being adopted especially with regard to step 3) transition tax. I am not holding my breath. . Further, there would be many technological challenges to implementing 4)a tax use choice though they are tech implementation problems, not theoretical limitations.
Perfection is a goal that is likely unattainable practically yet should be the goal towards which we strive. I hope we have the wisdom to continue to do so.

